[Devel] Re: [PATCH 2/2] sem restore: don't free sma if it's an error
Serge E. Hallyn
serue at us.ibm.com
Wed Jan 13 12:17:30 PST 2010
Quoting Serge E. Hallyn (serue at us.ibm.com):
> Quoting serue at us.ibm.com (serue at us.ibm.com):
> > From: Serge Hallyn <serue at us.ibm.com>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn <serue at us.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > ipc/checkpoint_sem.c | 1 +
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/ipc/checkpoint_sem.c b/ipc/checkpoint_sem.c
> > index 53a19ed..395c84d 100644
> > --- a/ipc/checkpoint_sem.c
> > +++ b/ipc/checkpoint_sem.c
> > @@ -186,6 +186,7 @@ int restore_ipc_sem(struct ckpt_ctx *ctx, struct ipc_namespace *ns)
> > sma = restore_sem_array(ctx, h->sem_nsems);
> > if (IS_ERR(sma)) {
> > ret = PTR_ERR(sma);
> > + sma = NULL;
> > goto out;
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 1.6.0.6
>
> So FWIW on x86-64 many of the tests current pass - the 3 failures I'm seeing
> are due to:
>
> 1. message queues for some reason aren't seen by the restarted
> task (restart does think it is restoring them according to debug
> info)
> 2. self-checkpoint not yet supported
> 3. restart block not set up right (or at least cr_tests/sleep fails
> for some reason, haven't yet looked at why)
>
> I'm trying to track down #1 right now
Oops, haha - bad selinux policy. Down to two errors then.
-serge
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
More information about the Devel
mailing list