[Devel] Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] cgroups: support for module-loadable subsystems
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
kamezawa.hiroyu at jp.fujitsu.com
Wed Jan 6 23:51:17 PST 2010
On Thu, 7 Jan 2010 02:48:12 -0500
Ben Blum <bblum at andrew.cmu.edu> wrote:
> > 2. Making this to be reasonable value.
> > #define CGROUP_SUBSYS_COUNT (BITS_PER_BYTE*sizeof(unsigned long))
> > I can't find why.
>
> "We limit to this many since cgroupfs_root has subsys_bits to keep track
> of all of them." should it be less, perhaps?
It's ok if it's clear that
"this decistion is done by implementation choice, not by cgroup's nature"
> the memory footprint is not
> great, it is true, but implementing dynamically sized subsystem tracking
> data structures requires much cleverer code in many places.
>
yes. I don't request that.
> > 3. show whehter a subsys is a loadable module or not via /proc/cgroups
>
> with just "y" or "n"? possible, and probably easy. do note that since
> they are sorted by subsys_id, all the ones above a certain line will be
> "n" and all below will be "y".
>
yes.
#subsys_name hierarchy num_cgroups enabled module
cpuset 0 1 1 0
and 0/1 to show y/n ? (but this cause interface incompatibility...)
Thanks,
-Kame
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
More information about the Devel
mailing list