[Devel] Re: [PATCH 1/1] RFC: taking a crack at targeted capabilities
Eric W. Biederman
ebiederm at xmission.com
Wed Jan 6 16:16:35 PST 2010
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue at us.ibm.com> writes:
> Quoting Eric W. Biederman (ebiederm at xmission.com):
>> "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue at us.ibm.com> writes:
>>
>> >> - Introduce ns_capable to test for a capability in a non-default
>> >> user namespace.
>> >> - Teach cap_capable to handle capabilities in a non-default
>> >> user namespace.
>> >
>> > So yeah, I didn't address the whole has_capability junk. Feh.
>>
>> That just fell out...
>>
>> > So do you intend to tag all namespaces with the userns which
>> > created it? So sys_hostname() can check utsname->uts_ns->creator,
>> > and net ioctl SIOCSIFNAME checks struct net->creator?
>>
>> That is the plan. Add a creator/usernamespace as part of the patches
>> to support creating a new namespace without the global CAP_SYS_ADMIN.
>
> Cool - are you working on that right now, or should I start it myself
> if i'm bored and restless tonight?
Go for it. I have some things to wrap up before I can do much with this,
despite the fact I want to.
Eric
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
More information about the Devel
mailing list