[Devel] Re: [PATCH][RFC] checkpoint: refuse to checkpoint if monitoring directories with dnotify

[Oren Laadan]

After self-review:
Acked-by: Oren Laadan <orenl at cs.columbia.edu>

Will pull for v19.

Oren.

Matt Helsley wrote:
> Reviewing my own patch...
> 
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 02:10:58PM -0800, Matt Helsley wrote:
> 
> <snip>
> 
>> diff --git a/fs/notify/dnotify/dnotify.c b/fs/notify/dnotify/dnotify.c
>> index 7e54e52..9ce85f5 100644
>> --- a/fs/notify/dnotify/dnotify.c
>> +++ b/fs/notify/dnotify/dnotify.c
>> @@ -289,6 +289,28 @@ static int attach_dn(struct dnotify_struct *dn, struct dnotify_mark_entry *dnent
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>>
>> +int is_dnotify_attached(struct file *filp)
>> +{
>> +	struct fsnotify_mark_entry *entry;
>> +	struct dnotify_mark_entry *dnentry;
>> +	struct dnotify_struct *dn;
>> +	struct dnotify_struct **prev;
> 
> Ugh, most of these variables aren't needed.
> 
>> +	struct inode *inode;
>> +
>> +	inode = filp->f_path.dentry->d_inode;
>> +	if (!S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode))
>> +		return 0;
>> +
>> +	spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
>> +	entry = fsnotify_find_mark_entry(dnotify_group, inode);
>> +	spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
>> +	if (entry) {
>> +		fsnotify_put_mark(new_entry);
>> +		return 1;
>> +	}
> 
> I flipped the test to look more like normal kernel code and fixed the
> parameter to fsnotify_put_mark():
> 
> 	if (!entry)
> 		return 0;
> 	fsnotify_put_mark(entry);
> 	return 1;
> 
> Cheers,
> 	-Matt Helsley
> _______________________________________________
> Containers mailing list
> Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
> 
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers