[Devel] Re: [PATCH 2/4] C/R: Basic support for network namespaces and devices (v3)

[Serge E. Hallyn]

Quoting Dan Smith (danms at us.ibm.com):
> SH> I think that's be better.  Right now if we checkpoint a container
> SH> with macvlan restart will be bogus, right?  We're trying to avoid
> SH> any cases where we can't tell, at checkpoint, that restart won't
> SH> be right.
> 
> Depends on your definition of bogus, and the situation, but okay.
> 
> SH> What I was asking is should do_veth_message() be in drivers/net/veth.c?
> 
> Well, we could add another ndo_* function to the net device, I guess,
> but I'd be afraid we'd hit some cases where that wasn't sufficient.
> Maybe it would be best to generalize that bit after I've added macvlan
> (,etc) support so we have a good idea of what else would be needed?

Yeah, I think you're right.

thanks,
-serge
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers