[Devel] Re: [RFC PATCH] c/r: fixed false complaint on "unlinked" pipes, socket, etc

[Oren Laadan]

Heh ... following the discussion on the IRC, I actually prefer
a solution that will push tests that are not filesystm-agnostic
to the filesystem-specific .checkpoint method.  Then also put
it in the generic .checkpoint method to catch the "default" case.

I think it's cleaner and does not introduce needless noise in
the kernel.

FWIW, not only for the d_unlinked() test, but also for the locks
issue;  even though locks are supposed to be VFS generic and not
depend on specific filesystem, apparently they do. (Either that
or fix find_locks_with_owner() in a generic way).

Oren.


Dan Smith wrote:
> OL> Comments ?
> 
> Works for me (although the issue remains that find_locks_with_owner()
> thinks there are locks present on a socket).
> 
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers