[Devel] Re: [PATCH] user_ns: Improve the user_ns on-the-slab packaging
Pavel Emelyanov
xemul at parallels.com
Tue Dec 7 06:33:04 PST 2010
On 12/07/2010 05:27 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Pavel Emelyanov (xemul at parallels.com):
>> Currently on 64-bit arch the user_namespace is 2096 and when
>> being kmalloc-ed it resides on a 4k slab wasting 2003 bytes.
>>
>> If we allocate a separate cache for it and reduce the hash size
>> from 128 to 64 chains the packaging becomes *much* better - the
>
> Hey Pavel,
>
> I trust you've done some performance tests and found no
> regressions with a few hundred users?
How many hundreds are you interested in? :) 128 users didn't
reveal any regressions.
> -serge
>
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
More information about the Devel
mailing list