[Devel] Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] cgroup: add per cgroup timer_slack_ns
Paul Menage
menage at google.com
Thu Dec 2 12:52:36 PST 2010
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 12:45 PM, jacob pan
<jacob.jun.pan at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> I guess timer_slack_ns alone cannot qualify for a new subsystem,
I think that it's providing a sufficiently different control from
existing subsystems that making it a separate subsystem is reasonable.
The cpuset subsystem definitely doesn't sound like the right place,
since it's more dealing with numa isolation/policy. The cpu subsystem
could be, since it also deals with scheduling stuff.
Paul
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
More information about the Devel
mailing list