[Devel] Re: [RFC][v6][PATCH 8/9]: Define clone_with_pids() syscall

[Louis Rilling]

On 11/09/09 12:31 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 10 September 2009, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> > Since this is a variant of clone() and clone is listed as a PTREGSCALL(),
> > I pass in the pt_regs.
> > 
> > arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S lists clone() under this comment:
> > 
> > /*
> >  * System calls that need a pt_regs pointer.
> >  */
> > 
> > Is there a guideline on what system calls use/need pt_regs ?
> 
> You need pt_regs if you access any registers from the user task
> other than the argument registers. In case of clone(), this is
> the user stack pointer.

AFAICS clone() actually needs _all_ registers (see x86 copy_thread() for
instance). Any variant of clone() will have this requirement.

Louis

-- 
Dr Louis Rilling			Kerlabs
Skype: louis.rilling			Batiment Germanium
Phone: (+33|0) 6 80 89 08 23		80 avenue des Buttes de Coesmes
http://www.kerlabs.com/			35700 Rennes
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openvz.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20090911/3f0d9ac5/attachment-0001.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers