[Devel] Re: [RFC][v5][PATCH 8/8]: Define clone_with_pids() syscall

[H. Peter Anvin]

On 09/09/2009 11:03 AM, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> 
> C90 or C99 below should work. Is it ok to use a data structure that is
> not in C89 ? 
> 

C89 is the same as C90 (C89 refers to the ANSI standard, C90 to the ISO
standard, but they're functionally identical.)

> BTW, would it work if we defined 
> 
> 	struct pid_set {
> 		u64 pids;
> 		int num_pids;
> 	}
> 
> where ->pids can be still be a pointer ? The data structure would
> have the same size on all architectures.
> 

It would rather suck in terms of usability, though.

	-hpa

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers