[Devel] Re: a room for blkio-cgroup in struct page_cgroup

[KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki]

Balbir Singh wrote:
> 2009/9/2 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu at jp.fujitsu.com>:
>> Ryo Tsuruta wrote:
>>> Hi Kamezawa-san,
>>>
>>> As you wrote before (http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/22/65)
>>>> To be honest, what I expected in these days for people of blockio
>>>> cgroup is like following for getting room for themselves.
>>> <<snip>>
>>>> --- mmotm-2.6.31-Jul16.orig/include/linux/page_cgroup.h
>>>> +++ mmotm-2.6.31-Jul16/include/linux/page_cgroup.h
>>>> @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
>>>> &#160;struct page_cgroup {
>>>> &#160; &#160; &#160; unsigned long flags;
>>>> &#160; &#160; &#160; struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup;
>>>> - &#160; &#160; struct page *page;
>>>> + &#160; &#160; /* block io tracking will use extra unsigned long
bytes */
>>>> &#160; &#160; &#160; struct list_head lru; &#160; &#160; &#160; /*
per cgroup LRU list */
>>>> };
>>>
>>> Have you already added a room for blkio_cgroup in struct page_cgroup?
>> No.
>>
>
> The diff above is unclear, are you removing struct page from page_cgroup?
>
I said him "if you want a room, plz get by youself, consider more"
And offered this change.
 http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/22/65
you were CC'd.
Because page_cgroup's layout is same to memmap, we can use similar function
as
  page_cgroup_to_pfn(), pfn_to_page_cgroup().
And, we don't access page_cgroup->page in fast path. (maybe)
But as I wrote, we're busy. I'll not do this until all performance fixes
go ahead.

Thanks,
-Kame

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers