[Devel] Re: [RFC][v8][PATCH 0/10] Implement clone3() system call

[Eric W. Biederman]

Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev at linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:

> Eric W. Biederman [ebiederm at xmission.com] wrote:
> | Not what I was thinking.  The following untested patch is what I was
> | thinking.  It just exposes last, min, and max to the callers which pass
> | in different appropriate values.
>
>
> Minor comments are that the caller has to choose which function to call
> and passing in 'target-1' for the 'last' in set_pidmap() seems a bit
> unnatural. But I can't think of a better way and I think this will work.
> Will test it out.

Thanks.  My primary concern was that we don't unnecessarily duplicate all
of the weird allocating a bitmap page code etc.

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers