[Devel] Re: [PATCH] test_and_set_bit returns oldval

Oren Laadan orenl at librato.com
Sun Oct 18 20:01:34 PDT 2009


Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> ckpt_set_ctx_error() was not setting ctx->errno when it should - it
> apparently thought that test_and_set_bit(x,y) would return 1 if the
> set_bit succeeded?
> 
> Fix ckpt_set_ctx_error() to set ctx->errno the first (and only the
> first) time that CKPT_CTX_ERROR gets set in ctx->kflags.

Yeah .. and it explains why you never saw the error as you expected.

Applied, thanks !

> 
> Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serue at us.ibm.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/checkpoint.h |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/checkpoint.h b/include/linux/checkpoint.h
> index 4b61378..c550039 100644
> --- a/include/linux/checkpoint.h
> +++ b/include/linux/checkpoint.h
> @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ extern int ckpt_sock_getnames(struct ckpt_ctx *ctx,
>  
>  static inline void ckpt_set_ctx_error(struct ckpt_ctx *ctx, int errno)
>  {
> -	if (ckpt_test_and_set_ctx_kflag(ctx, CKPT_CTX_ERROR))
> +	if (!ckpt_test_and_set_ctx_kflag(ctx, CKPT_CTX_ERROR))
>  		ctx->errno = errno;
>  }
>  
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers




More information about the Devel mailing list