[Devel] Re: [PATCH] test_and_set_bit returns oldval
Oren Laadan
orenl at librato.com
Sun Oct 18 20:01:34 PDT 2009
Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> ckpt_set_ctx_error() was not setting ctx->errno when it should - it
> apparently thought that test_and_set_bit(x,y) would return 1 if the
> set_bit succeeded?
>
> Fix ckpt_set_ctx_error() to set ctx->errno the first (and only the
> first) time that CKPT_CTX_ERROR gets set in ctx->kflags.
Yeah .. and it explains why you never saw the error as you expected.
Applied, thanks !
>
> Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serue at us.ibm.com>
> ---
> include/linux/checkpoint.h | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/checkpoint.h b/include/linux/checkpoint.h
> index 4b61378..c550039 100644
> --- a/include/linux/checkpoint.h
> +++ b/include/linux/checkpoint.h
> @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ extern int ckpt_sock_getnames(struct ckpt_ctx *ctx,
>
> static inline void ckpt_set_ctx_error(struct ckpt_ctx *ctx, int errno)
> {
> - if (ckpt_test_and_set_ctx_kflag(ctx, CKPT_CTX_ERROR))
> + if (!ckpt_test_and_set_ctx_kflag(ctx, CKPT_CTX_ERROR))
> ctx->errno = errno;
> }
>
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
More information about the Devel
mailing list