[Devel] Re: [PATCH 1/4] signals: SEND_SIG_NOINFO should be considered as SI_FROMUSER()
Roland McGrath
roland at redhat.com
Tue Oct 6 10:57:05 PDT 2009
> Perhaps, we should add the comment to explain that both SI_FROMUSER()
> and si_fromuser() are only valid in the sending pathes.
Yes. Also now that you put them both in a sentence together, it is clear
that it is insane to have two different things with those two names that
differ only in capitalization.
Thanks,
Roland
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
More information about the Devel
mailing list