[Devel] Re: [PATCH 3/9] user-cr: s390 eclone wrapper

Oren Laadan orenl at cs.columbia.edu
Wed Nov 25 10:40:46 PST 2009




Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Nathan Lynch (ntl at pobox.com):
>> On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 21:23 -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>>> Quoting Nathan Lynch (ntl at pobox.com):
>>>> Based on original work from Serge Hallyn.
>>> Needed the following patch on top of that.  Otherwise the
>>> whole set looks good to me, thanks!
>> Great, thanks for the fixups.
>>
>>
>>> (Oh, one other note, the default #ifdef for NR_eclone actually
>>> is different depending on whether we're on a c/r kernel or not,
>>> unfortunately :(.  I'm leaving it as the non-c/r kernel value
>>> for now.)
>> Right.. I was thinking that the syscall numbers for eclone should
>> precede those for checkpoint and restart in the c/r patch set.  Thoughts
>> on that?
> 
> Yes, I was thinking the same thing.

Good idea - will do in v19-rc2.

Oren.

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers




More information about the Devel mailing list