[Devel] Re: [PATCH 3/9] user-cr: s390 eclone wrapper

[Nathan Lynch]

On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 21:23 -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Nathan Lynch (ntl at pobox.com):
> > Based on original work from Serge Hallyn.
> 
> Needed the following patch on top of that.  Otherwise the
> whole set looks good to me, thanks!

Great, thanks for the fixups.


> (Oh, one other note, the default #ifdef for NR_eclone actually
> is different depending on whether we're on a c/r kernel or not,
> unfortunately :(.  I'm leaving it as the non-c/r kernel value
> for now.)

Right.. I was thinking that the syscall numbers for eclone should
precede those for checkpoint and restart in the c/r patch set.  Thoughts
on that?


_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers