[Devel] Re: [PATCH 3/4] Update the UNIX buffer restore code to match the new format saved in the image file

[Serge E. Hallyn]

Quoting Dan Smith (danms at us.ibm.com):
> SH> But so should check whether h->len_len < sysctl_wmem_max before
> SH> doing the capable check?  Remember that any check for capable()
> SH> will set PF_SUPERPRIV on the task, so it's better to not call it
> SH> if it wasn't definately needed.
> 
> Okay, sure.

Ok, thanks - I figured if I was misunderstanding, then this suggestion
would sound ridiculous and you'd suitably ridicule me  :)

thanks,
-serge
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers