[Devel] Re: [RFC] Mount point suggestions for cgroup

[Jan Safranek]

On 11/04/2009 04:21 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-11-04 at 13:46 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
>> The reason I liked /dev/cgroup was because cpusets could be
>> mounted at /dev/cpuset or /dev/cgroup/cpuset. My concern with /cgroup
>> is that a ls "/" now becomes larger in size. But I'll take your vote
>> for it as +1 for /cgroup.
>
> /dev/pts is a decent precedent for doing it under /dev, although it does
> deal with actual devices.  cgroups do not.

There is also /dev/shm, but IMHO that's not reason to pollute /dev with 
filesystems that are not devices.

Jan
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers