[Devel] Re: [PATCH] cr: ipc: don't unlock before calling freeary in error path

Oren Laadan orenl at cs.columbia.edu
Fri May 29 13:46:16 PDT 2009


Applied to ckpt-v16-dev.

As per Dave's note, it will be helpful if you mention which
patches in the original patchset are affected by this one,
e.g. I added:
    [re commit 615744ad97 ... c/r: support share-memory sysv-ipc]

Will make it easier to create the next clean patchset.

Thanks :)

Oren.

Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Else freeary will BUG out.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serue at us.ibm.com>
> ---
>  ipc/checkpoint_sem.c |    5 ++---
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/ipc/checkpoint_sem.c b/ipc/checkpoint_sem.c
> index 34dea40..e6934dc 100644
> --- a/ipc/checkpoint_sem.c
> +++ b/ipc/checkpoint_sem.c
> @@ -206,12 +206,11 @@ int restore_ipc_sem(struct ckpt_ctx *ctx)
>  	memcpy(sem->sem_base, sma, sem->sem_nsems * sizeof(*sma));
>  
>  	ret = load_ipc_sem_hdr(ctx, h, sem);
> -	ipc_unlock(perms);
> -
>  	if (ret < 0) {
>  		ckpt_debug("sem: need to remove (%d)\n", ret);
>  		freeary(current->nsproxy->ipc_ns, perms);
> -	}
> +	} else
> +		ipc_unlock(perms);
>  	up_write(&sem_ids->rw_mutex);
>   out:
>  	kfree(sma);
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers




More information about the Devel mailing list