[Devel] Re: [PATCH] cgroups: handle failure of cgroup_populate_dir() at mount/remount
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
kamezawa.hiroyu at jp.fujitsu.com
Tue May 26 18:34:04 PDT 2009
On Wed, 27 May 2009 09:07:31 +0800
Li Zefan <lizf at cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Paul Menage wrote:
> > On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 1:25 AM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
> > <kamezawa.hiroyu at jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> >> Hm, shouldn't we allow "noprefix" to be effective only agaisnt cpuset ?
> >> I think it's just for backward-compatibility of cpuset.
> >> (I don't like the option at all.)
> >
> > Yes, exposing the "noprefix" option externally was one of the mistakes
> > I made when developing cgroups.
> >
> > It seems to me really unlikely that anyone is using "noprefix" for
>
> And "noprefix" is not documented in cgroups.txt, so I guess not
> many people know this option. Even libcgroup doesn't handle it.
>
> > anything other than implicitly when mounting the "cpuset" filesystem.
> > So I'd be inclined to just forbid it if we're mounting more than just
> > the cpuset subsystem. A bit of a nasty abstraction violation, but it
> > makes more sense overall. The only problem is that someone *might* be
> > using it - do we have any way to determine how, and how big do they
> > have to be before we care?
> >
>
> I think we can never know..
How about this method ?
- add "noprefix" to "to-be-removed" list.
- add "WARNING: noprefix option will be removed in 2.6.32 (or 2.6.31)" now
- remove "noprefix" in 2.6.31-rc or later
Thanks,
-Kame
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
More information about the Devel
mailing list