[Devel] Re: [PATCH] cgroups: handle failure of cgroup_populate_dir() at mount/remount
Paul Menage
menage at google.com
Tue May 26 15:06:25 PDT 2009
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 1:25 AM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
<kamezawa.hiroyu at jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> Hm, shouldn't we allow "noprefix" to be effective only agaisnt cpuset ?
> I think it's just for backward-compatibility of cpuset.
> (I don't like the option at all.)
Yes, exposing the "noprefix" option externally was one of the mistakes
I made when developing cgroups.
It seems to me really unlikely that anyone is using "noprefix" for
anything other than implicitly when mounting the "cpuset" filesystem.
So I'd be inclined to just forbid it if we're mounting more than just
the cpuset subsystem. A bit of a nasty abstraction violation, but it
makes more sense overall. The only problem is that someone *might* be
using it - do we have any way to determine how, and how big do they
have to be before we care?
Paul
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
More information about the Devel
mailing list