[Devel] Re: [PATCH 01/10] Documentation

[Fabio Checconi]

> From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal at redhat.com>
> Date: Tue, Mar 24, 2009 02:29:06PM -0400
>
...
> > Does keeping the sync queue in ready tree solves the problem too? Is
> > it because it avoid a virtual time jump?
> > 
> 
> I have not tried the second approch yet. But that also should solve the
> vtime jump issue.
> 

Do you mean that you intend to keep a queue with no backlog in the
active tree?
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers