[Devel] Re: [PATCH] [RFC] c/r: Add UTS support (v2)

[Dan Smith]

SH> Someone might complain about the per-task namespace data not
SH> showing up in the per-task data, but I think the way you have it
SH> simplifies things enough to justify it.

Yeah, mktree would get pretty ugly without doing it ahead of time, I
think.

SH> Do add a note to Documentation/checkpoint/internals.txt (and maybe
SH> use __NEW_UTS_LEN+1 instead of 65), but other than that it looks
SH> good to me.

I was replicating exactly what is in the struct definitions of
linux/utsname.h, but okay :)

-- 
Dan Smith
IBM Linux Technology Center
email: danms at us.ibm.com

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers