[Devel] Re: [PATCH 0/7][v8] Container-init signal semantics

[Daniel Lezcano]

Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 20:43 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>   
>>         case LINUX_REBOOT_CMD_HALT:
>> -               kernel_halt();
>> -               unlock_kernel();
>> -               do_exit(0);
>> +               if (power_off_pid_ns(current->nsproxy->pid_ns)) {
>> +                       kernel_halt();
>> +                       unlock_kernel();
>> +                       do_exit(0);
>> +               }
>>     
>
> Even if current will get SIGKILLed when zap_pid_ns_processes() is
> called, I see no reason it doesn't call do_exit(0).
Right and unlock_kernel too :)
>   
>>                 break;
>>
>>         case LINUX_REBOOT_CMD_POWER_OFF:
>> -               kernel_power_off();
>> -               unlock_kernel();
>> -               do_exit(0);
>> +               if (power_off_pid_ns(current->nsproxy->pid_ns)) {
>> +                       kernel_power_off();
>> +                       unlock_kernel();
>> +                       do_exit(0);
>> +               }
>>     
>
> Same.
>
>   
>>                 break;
>>
>>     

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers