[Devel] Re: [PATCH 1/1] checkpoint: Note checkpointability of mm_struct (v2)
Dan Smith
danms at us.ibm.com
Wed Mar 4 14:01:23 PST 2009
SH> +static inline void task_show_checkpointable(struct seq_file *m,
SH> + struct task_struct *p)
SH> +{
SH> + if (test_bit(0, &p->mm->may_checkpoint))
SH> + seq_printf(m, "mm is checkpointable\n");
^^^
You have a hard tab in the middle of the line. Was that intentional?
SH> + else
SH> + seq_printf(m, "mm is not checkpointable\n");
SH> +
SH> + if (test_bit(0, &p->files->may_checkpoint))
SH> + seq_printf(m, "files are checkpointable\n");
SH> + else
SH> + seq_printf(m, "files are not checkpointable\n");
SH> +}
These too.
SH> +static inline void __mm_deny_checkpointing(struct mm_struct *mm,
SH> + char *file, int line)
SH> +{
SH> + if (!test_and_clear_bit(0, &mm->may_checkpoint))
SH> + return;
SH> + printk(KERN_INFO "process performed an (mm) action that can not be "
SH> + "checkpointed at: %s:%d\n", file, line);
SH> +}
SH> +#define mm_deny_checkpointing(f) \
SH> + __mm_deny_checkpointing(f, __FILE__, __LINE__)
There is no definition of mm_deny_checkpointing() outside of
CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTART, which means that you get a build error
because mm->may_checkpoint is only present when CR is enabled.
SH> - WARN_ON(1);
SH> + //WARN_ON(1);
I assume commenting this out wasn't intended to be in this patch.
--
Dan Smith
IBM Linux Technology Center
email: danms at us.ibm.com
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
More information about the Devel
mailing list