[Devel] Re: [BUG] net_cls: Panic occured when net_cls subsystem use

[jamal]

Apologies for the latency.

On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 11:27 +0000, Jarek Poplawski wrote:

> After the second look I have some questions:
> - if it's really aimed to skip checking by ->get() tp's before they're
> configured in ->change(), maybe instead of using tp_c to check this it
> would be simpler to generally skip calling ->get() for newly created
> tp's?
> - otherwise the current method probably needs adding a tp_c check for
> NULL in u32_destroy()?
> - it seems this method would also need adding a 'handle' lookup to
> the u32_change(); otherwise its 'handle' parameter isn't controlled
> for for uniqueness, unless I miss something?

Lets just ignore the need for these changes since the patch fixes them
for now. I would still like to make the changes i suggested but later
with more thought put into them.

cheers,
jamal

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers