[Devel] Re: [PATCH 4/4] Conditionally force on namespaces
Oren Laadan
orenl at cs.columbia.edu
Sun Jun 7 23:21:29 PDT 2009
Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Dave Hansen (dave at linux.vnet.ibm.com):
>> This should work around the compile issues that Nathan
>> pointed out yesterday. It's too bad that 'select' is
>> such a blunt object. We could surely use a soft select
>> or something. But this hacks around it a bit.
>>
>> Create a separate "*_NS_DEP" Kconfig option for the
>> dependencies for each namespace. Make the real config
>> option and the c/r 'select' bot dependent on the new
>> common one.
>>
>> This should at least keep compile errors from being
>> introduced. Whether this is rude or not is a separate
>> questions. :)
>
> Yeah I'm not sure I'm a fan of this...
>
> While I hate chasing down missing dependencies, maybe
> CONFIG_CHECKPOINT should just depend on all the namespaces
> instead of selecting them?
>
Current c/r can work without namespaces - it should not
depend on CONFIG_NAMESPACE (though it can suggest).
Oren.
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
More information about the Devel
mailing list