[Devel] Re: [PATCH] checkpoint/restart of robust futex lists
Oren Laadan
orenl at cs.columbia.edu
Sun Jun 7 19:37:38 PDT 2009
Matt Helsley wrote:
> Save and restore the [compat_]robust_list member of the task struct.
>
> These lists record which futexes the task holds. To keep the overhead of
> robust futexes low the list is kept in userspace. When the task exits the
> kernel carefully walks these lists to recover held futexes that
> other tasks may be attempting to acquire with FUTEX_WAIT.
>
> Because they point to userspace memory that is saved/restored by
> checkpoint/restart saving the list pointers works.
>
> While saving the pointers works during checkpoint, restart is tricky
> because the robust futex ABI contains provisions for changes based on
> checking the size of the list head. So we need to save the length of
> the list head too in order to make sure that the kernel used during
> restart is capable of handling that ABI. Since there is only one ABI
> supported at the moment taking the list head's size is simple. Should
> the ABI change we will need to use the same size as specified during
> sys_set_robust_list() and hence some new means of determining the length
> of this userspace structure in sys_checkpoint would be required.
>
> Rather than rewrite the logic that checks and handles the ABI we reuse
> sys_set_robust_list() by factoring out the body of the function and
> calling it during restart.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Helsley <matthltc at us.ibm.com>
Patch looks good. Too bad we don't support futex, yet...
Oren.
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
More information about the Devel
mailing list