[Devel] Re: [PATCH] Enhance checkpoint/restart Kconfig options
Dave Hansen
dave at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Thu Jun 4 13:17:01 PDT 2009
On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 15:01 -0500, Nathan Lynch wrote:
> Dave Hansen <dave at linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> > diff -puN checkpoint/Kconfig~cr-kconfig-fixup checkpoint/Kconfig
> > --- linux-2.6.git/checkpoint/Kconfig~cr-kconfig-fixup 2009-06-04 11:38:57.000000000 -0700
> > +++ linux-2.6.git-dave/checkpoint/Kconfig 2009-06-04 11:38:57.000000000 -0700
> > @@ -7,9 +7,14 @@ config DEFERQUEUE
> > default n
> >
> > config CHECKPOINT
> > - bool "Enable checkpoint/restart (EXPERIMENTAL)"
> > + bool "Checkpoint/restart (EXPERIMENTAL)"
> > depends on CHECKPOINT_SUPPORT && EXPERIMENTAL
> > select DEFERQUEUE
> > + select UTS_NS
> > + select IPC_NS
> > + select NET_NS
> > + select PID_NS
> > + select USER_NS
>
> *_NS all depend on NAMESPACES at the very least; some have additional
> dependencies. Selecting a symbol without ensuring its dependencies are
> enabled is one way to break a build.
Ahh, but there *isn't* a strict build dependency on them. We just want
to make sure that if they're available that we enable them. If we have
CONFIG_NET=n, then we certainly don't want to make CHECKPOINT depends on
it.
> Also - checkpoint is useful without *_NS, no? Forcing these things on
> seems a little user-hostile..
I think the hostile thing is trying to completely unshare all the
namespaces without checking to see which ones are enabled, first. ;)
-- Dave
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
More information about the Devel
mailing list