[Devel] Re: [PATCH 3/9] blkio-cgroup-v9: The new page_cgroup framework
Balbir Singh
balbir at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Tue Jul 21 08:56:36 PDT 2009
* Ryo Tsuruta <ryov at valinux.co.jp> [2009-07-21 23:12:11]:
> This patch makes the page_cgroup framework be able to be used even if
> the compile option of the cgroup memory controller is off.
> So blkio-cgroup can use this framework without the memory controller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hirokazu Takahashi <taka at valinux.co.jp>
> Signed-off-by: Ryo Tsuruta <ryov at valinux.co.jp>
>
> ---
> include/linux/memcontrol.h | 6 ++++++
> include/linux/mmzone.h | 4 ++--
> include/linux/page_cgroup.h | 8 +++++---
> init/Kconfig | 4 ++++
> mm/Makefile | 3 ++-
> mm/memcontrol.c | 6 ++++++
> mm/page_cgroup.c | 3 +--
> 7 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6.31-rc3/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.31-rc3.orig/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> +++ linux-2.6.31-rc3/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> @@ -37,6 +37,8 @@ struct mm_struct;
> * (Of course, if memcg does memory allocation in future, GFP_KERNEL is sane.)
> */
>
> +extern void __init_mem_page_cgroup(struct page_cgroup *pc);
> +
> extern int mem_cgroup_newpage_charge(struct page *page, struct mm_struct *mm,
> gfp_t gfp_mask);
> /* for swap handling */
> @@ -121,6 +123,10 @@ void mem_cgroup_update_mapped_file_stat(
> #else /* CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR */
> struct mem_cgroup;
>
> +static inline void __init_mem_page_cgroup(struct page_cgroup *pc)
> +{
> +}
> +
> static inline int mem_cgroup_newpage_charge(struct page *page,
> struct mm_struct *mm, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> {
> Index: linux-2.6.31-rc3/include/linux/mmzone.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.31-rc3.orig/include/linux/mmzone.h
> +++ linux-2.6.31-rc3/include/linux/mmzone.h
> @@ -605,7 +605,7 @@ typedef struct pglist_data {
> int nr_zones;
> #ifdef CONFIG_FLAT_NODE_MEM_MAP /* means !SPARSEMEM */
> struct page *node_mem_map;
> -#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_PAGE
> struct page_cgroup *node_page_cgroup;
> #endif
> #endif
> @@ -956,7 +956,7 @@ struct mem_section {
>
> /* See declaration of similar field in struct zone */
> unsigned long *pageblock_flags;
> -#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_PAGE
> /*
> * If !SPARSEMEM, pgdat doesn't have page_cgroup pointer. We use
> * section. (see memcontrol.h/page_cgroup.h about this.)
> Index: linux-2.6.31-rc3/include/linux/page_cgroup.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.31-rc3.orig/include/linux/page_cgroup.h
> +++ linux-2.6.31-rc3/include/linux/page_cgroup.h
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
> #ifndef __LINUX_PAGE_CGROUP_H
> #define __LINUX_PAGE_CGROUP_H
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_PAGE
> #include <linux/bit_spinlock.h>
> /*
> * Page Cgroup can be considered as an extended mem_map.
> @@ -12,9 +12,11 @@
> */
> struct page_cgroup {
> unsigned long flags;
> - struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup;
> struct page *page;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR
> + struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup;
> struct list_head lru; /* per cgroup LRU list */
> +#endif
> };
If CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR is not enabled and CGROUP_PAGE is
(assuming that the depends on below is refactored), what would this
change buy us? What is page_cgroup helping us track, the mem_cgroup is
factored out, so we are interested in the flags only?
>
> void __meminit pgdat_page_cgroup_init(struct pglist_data *pgdat);
> @@ -83,7 +85,7 @@ static inline void unlock_page_cgroup(st
> bit_spin_unlock(PCG_LOCK, &pc->flags);
> }
>
> -#else /* CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR */
> +#else /* CONFIG_CGROUP_PAGE */
> struct page_cgroup;
>
> static inline void __meminit pgdat_page_cgroup_init(struct pglist_data *pgdat)
> Index: linux-2.6.31-rc3/init/Kconfig
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.31-rc3.orig/init/Kconfig
> +++ linux-2.6.31-rc3/init/Kconfig
> @@ -614,6 +614,10 @@ config CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_SWAP
>
> endif # CGROUPS
>
> +config CGROUP_PAGE
> + def_bool y
Should def_bool be "y"? Shouldn't the CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR select it.
> + depends on CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR
> +
> config MM_OWNER
> bool
>
> Index: linux-2.6.31-rc3/mm/Makefile
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.31-rc3.orig/mm/Makefile
> +++ linux-2.6.31-rc3/mm/Makefile
> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ else
> obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += allocpercpu.o
> endif
> obj-$(CONFIG_QUICKLIST) += quicklist.o
> -obj-$(CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR) += memcontrol.o page_cgroup.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR) += memcontrol.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_CGROUP_PAGE) += page_cgroup.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK) += kmemleak.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK_TEST) += kmemleak-test.o
> Index: linux-2.6.31-rc3/mm/memcontrol.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.31-rc3.orig/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ linux-2.6.31-rc3/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -129,6 +129,12 @@ struct mem_cgroup_lru_info {
> struct mem_cgroup_per_node *nodeinfo[MAX_NUMNODES];
> };
>
> +void __meminit __init_mem_page_cgroup(struct page_cgroup *pc)
> +{
> + pc->mem_cgroup = NULL;
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pc->lru);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * The memory controller data structure. The memory controller controls both
> * page cache and RSS per cgroup. We would eventually like to provide
> Index: linux-2.6.31-rc3/mm/page_cgroup.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.31-rc3.orig/mm/page_cgroup.c
> +++ linux-2.6.31-rc3/mm/page_cgroup.c
> @@ -14,9 +14,8 @@ static void __meminit
> __init_page_cgroup(struct page_cgroup *pc, unsigned long pfn)
> {
> pc->flags = 0;
> - pc->mem_cgroup = NULL;
> pc->page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
> - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pc->lru);
> + __init_mem_page_cgroup(pc);
> }
> static unsigned long total_usage;
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
Balbir
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
More information about the Devel
mailing list