[Devel] Re: [PATCH 3/3] Quick vmalloc vs kmalloc fix to the case where array size is too large
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
kamezawa.hiroyu at jp.fujitsu.com
Mon Jul 13 21:25:38 PDT 2009
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 21:04:32 -0700
Paul Menage <menage at google.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 8:53 PM, KAMEZAWA
> Hiroyuki<kamezawa.hiroyu at jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > Hmm, ok...then, if too much pids, you hit vmalloc()/vfree() problem again.
> > So, it's not good idea to use vmalloc/vfree here after all.
> >
>
> Agreed, using vmalloc()/vfree() isn't a perfect solution, but at least
> the approach of kmalloc() for small allocations and vmalloc() for
> larger allocations solves the current problem (reading tasks/procs
> files can fail due to lack of contiguous kmalloc memory) without
> introducing overhead in the typical case.
>
My point is
- More PIDs, More time necessary to read procs file.
This patch boost it ;) Seems like "visit this later again" ,or FIXME patch.
Thanks,
-Kame
> Paul
>
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
More information about the Devel
mailing list