[Devel] Re: [RFCv2][PATCH] flexible array implementation
Dave Hansen
dave at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Tue Jul 21 15:09:05 PDT 2009
On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 15:00 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
>
> The interface is dirt simple. 4 functions:
> alloc_flex_array()
> free_flex_array()
> flex_array_put()
> flex_array_get()
>
> put() appends an item into the array while get() takes
> indexes and does array-style access.
I need to update this description, but the kerneldoc comments are up to
date.
That reminds me... People will get somewhat weird behavior if they mix
flex_array_append() and flex_array_put(). Is that OK? Should
flex_array_put() modify ->nr_elements to point to the element past the
one that was just put()? Should we perhaps drop the append() function
and the ->nr_elements variable completely?
-- Dave
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
More information about the Devel
mailing list