[Devel] Re: [PATCH 4/7][v7] Protect cinit from unblocked SIG_DFL signals
Sukadev Bhattiprolu
sukadev at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Mon Jan 19 17:07:34 PST 2009
Oleg Nesterov [oleg at redhat.com] wrote:
| On 01/17, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
| >
| > @@ -1331,7 +1341,7 @@ int send_sigqueue(struct sigqueue *q, struct task_struct *t, int group)
| > goto ret;
| >
| > ret = 1; /* the signal is ignored */
| > - if (!prepare_signal(sig, t))
| > + if (!prepare_signal(sig, t, 1))
|
| Hmm, just noticed. This looks wrong, it should be prepare_signal(sig, t, 0),
| no?
Grr. I missed that when we changed the parameter from 'same-ns' to
'from_ancestor_ns' and inverted the logic.
|
| For example, /sbin/init can create the posix timer with sigev_signo = SIGKILL
| and it won't be killed before this patch.
|
| This also looks wrong from the masquerading pov.
|
|
| Otherwise, the patches 1-6 are imho fine.
Thanks, Will resend this patch.
Sukadev
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
More information about the Devel
mailing list