[Devel] Re: How much of a mess does OpenVZ make? ; ) Was: What can OpenVZ do?
Alexey Dobriyan
adobriyan at gmail.com
Fri Feb 27 02:59:35 PST 2009
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 01:22:09AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:03:23 +0100 Ingo Molnar <mingo at elte.hu> wrote:
>
> > > arch/x86/include/asm/unistd_32.h | 2
> > > arch/x86/kernel/syscall_table_32.S | 2
> > > include/linux/Kbuild | 1
> > > include/linux/cr.h | 56 ++++++
> > > include/linux/ipc_namespace.h | 3
> > > include/linux/syscalls.h | 5
> > > init/Kconfig | 2
> > > kernel/Makefile | 1
> > > kernel/cr/Kconfig | 11 +
> > > kernel/cr/Makefile | 8
> > > kernel/cr/cpt-cred.c | 115 +++++++++++++
> > > kernel/cr/cpt-fs.c | 122 +++++++++++++
> > > kernel/cr/cpt-mm.c | 134 +++++++++++++++
> > > kernel/cr/cpt-ns.c | 324 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > kernel/cr/cpt-signal.c | 121 +++++++++++++
> > > kernel/cr/cpt-sys.c | 228 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > kernel/cr/cr-ctx.c | 141 ++++++++++++++++
> > > kernel/cr/cr.h | 61 ++++++
> > > kernel/cr/rst-sys.c | 9 +
> > > kernel/sys_ni.c | 3
> > > 20 files changed, 1349 insertions(+)
> >
> > That does not look scary to me at all. Andrew?
>
> btw, why is there no need for a kernel/cr/cpt-net.c?
Too early :-) There is no rst-*.c counterparts either :-) But I'm
working on this.
But, yes, cpt-net.c will be definitely: all sorts of sockets, virtual
netdevices, iptables, ...
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
More information about the Devel
mailing list