[Devel] Re: [PATCH 2/2] c/r: define s390-specific checkpoint-restart code (v5)

[Serge E. Hallyn]

Quoting Dave Hansen (dave at linux.vnet.ibm.com):
> On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 14:04 -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > OTOH I'm not eager to make such a change right now only to find
> > months later that there was a good reason to keep it in the hdr
> > after all  :)
> 
> The thing that bothers me about all of these things is that we can't
> truly evaluate them on their merits because we can't see how they are
> expected to be used in the future.  Surely there are multiple ways we
> can implement details of the incremental checkpoint.
> 
> -- Dave

Oh I think that was a bogus guess on my part anyway.

Like I say I don't want to encourage churn for the sake of churn
at this point, but you've got me thinking that moving parent into
the details and giving it a more useful name could *really*
dilute some of the mystery in these patches.

It's sounding good to me...

-serge
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers