[Devel] Re: [cgroup or VFS ?] WARNING: at fs/namespace.c:636 mntput_no_expire+0xac/0xf2()
Li Zefan
lizf at cn.fujitsu.com
Wed Feb 11 22:10:37 PST 2009
Li Zefan wrote:
> Al Viro wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 12:40:46AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>>> Thread 1:
>>>> for ((; ;))
>>>> {
>>>> mount -t cgroup -o cpuset xxx /mnt > /dev/null 2>&1
>>>> mkdir /mnt/0 > /dev/null 2>&1
>>>> rmdir /mnt/0 > /dev/null 2>&1
>>>> umount /mnt > /dev/null 2>&1
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> Thread 2:
>>>> {
>>>> mount -t cpuset xxx /mnt > /dev/null 2>&1
>>>> umount /mnt > /dev/null 2>&1
>>>> }
>> How cute... Same mountpoint in both, so these mount(2) will sometimes
>> fail (cgroup picks the same sb on the same options, AFAICS) and fail
>> silently due to these redirects...
>>
>> That's a lovely way to stress-test a large part of ro-bind stuff *and*
>> umount()-related code. Could you do C equivalent of the above (just
>> the same syscalls in loop, nothing fancier) and do time-stamped strace?
>>
>
> Sure, I'll write a C version and try to reproduce the warning.
>
Unfortunately, the C equivalent can't reproduce the warning, I've run the
test for the whole night. :( While using the script, often I can trigger
the warning in several mins.
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
More information about the Devel
mailing list