[Devel] Re: [lxc-devel] Memory Resources
Daniel Lezcano
daniel.lezcano at free.fr
Mon Aug 31 02:24:07 PDT 2009
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:32:56 +0200
> Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano at free.fr> wrote:
>
>>> steps: b, c, d can be done inside lxc tools. step a can't and it is base on
>>> the admin policy.
>>>
>>> I think that the first solution is more automatic and can be done by lxc
>>> tools (maybe command line switch? I can prepare a patch for that.
>>>
>>>
>> I do not know smack, what does smack here ? Will this solution avoid the
>> container to overwrite /proc/meminfo by remounting /proc ?
>>
>>
> Hmm, how about supporting custom FUSE for private-proc by user land ?
> It seems what virtualized hosts want to see is different from what kernel shows.
> For example, you can show correct "uptime" for virtualized environ.
>
Yep, interesting and maybe a solution for the application containers.
In the case of the system container, that will be the distro scripts
which will mount the /proc directory with the usual mount options. The
objective is to avoid to modify the distro scripts and let them do the
work, like mounting /proc. If we use a fuse procfs, we will need to
change these scripts to do the correct mount, no ? (note we have the
same problem with /cgroup/meminfo solution).
-- Daniel
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
More information about the Devel
mailing list