[Devel] [PATCH] Improve debug output from ckpt_notify_error()
Matt Helsley
matthltc at us.ibm.com
Mon Aug 17 13:34:23 PDT 2009
Make ckpt_debug() report a more useful location than the
line of some generic debug/error wrapper.
Signed-off-by: Matt Helsley <matthltc at us.ibm.com>
diff --git a/checkpoint/restart.c b/checkpoint/restart.c
index 3d3d4ed..febc9b7 100644
--- a/checkpoint/restart.c
+++ b/checkpoint/restart.c
@@ -485,13 +485,20 @@ static inline int is_task_active(struct ckpt_ctx *ctx, pid_t pid)
return get_active_pid(ctx) == pid;
}
-static inline void ckpt_notify_error(struct ckpt_ctx *ctx)
+static inline void _ckpt_notify_error(struct ckpt_ctx *ctx)
{
- ckpt_debug("ctx with root pid %d (%p)", ctx->root_pid, ctx);
ckpt_set_ctx_error(ctx);
complete(&ctx->complete);
}
+/* Need to call ckpt_debug such that it will get the correct source location */
+#define ckpt_notify_error(ctx) \
+do { \
+ ckpt_debug("ctx with root pid %d (%p)", ctx->root_pid, ctx); \
+ _ckpt_notify_error(ctx); \
+} while(0)
+
+
int ckpt_activate_next(struct ckpt_ctx *ctx)
{
struct task_struct *task;
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
More information about the Devel
mailing list