[Devel] Re: [PATCH] range-bw: Another I/O scheduling policy of dm-ioband supporting the predicable I/O bandwidth (range bandwidth)

[Ryo Tsuruta]

Hi Dong-Jae,

> range-bw is based on newest version of dm-ioband, bio-cgroup V7(4
> patch files), dm-ioband-V1.10.3(1 patch file) and these can be
> referred in
> http://people.valinux.co.jp/~ryov/dm-ioband/
> http://people.valinux.co.jp/~ryov/bio-cgroup/
> and the below range-bw patch file(dm-ioband-rangebw-1.10.3.patch)
> including Ryo’s patch set is also referred in:
> http://www.corsetproject.net/browser/corset_source_code/resource_controllers/disk_controller/Range-BW-for-dmioband-V1.10.3
> You have to apply this(dm-ioband-rangebw-1.10.3.patch) patch file
> after applying dm-ioband and bio-cgroup patches.
> 
> The released range-bw may have some problems and improper code
> although I try to test heavily. It is first release ^^
> And it is required to reduce the overhead of I/O scheduling and to
> optimize the source code.
> Any comments or advices is welcome
> 
> Ryo Tsuruta, Can you check this patch file ?
> for convenience, patch file is attached in this mail.

I took a quick look at your patch. It seems to be no problem for
existing dm-ioband code, but I would suggest you that you had better
use checkpatch.pl to check for your coding style.
The patch could be applied and compiled successfully. I did a simple
test, running fio on each cgroup in 30 seconds simultaneously, and got
the following results.

               w/o range-bw     w/ range-bw (min&max-bw settings)
cgroup1          331KB/s             102KB/s (100KB)
cgroup2          331KB/s             196KB/s (200KB)

Do you have any benchmark resutls? I'd be very interested to see it.

Thanks,
Ryo Tsuruta
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers