[Devel] Re: [PATCH 04/30] ipcns: add create_ipc_ns()
Alexey Dobriyan
adobriyan at gmail.com
Fri Apr 10 04:25:32 PDT 2009
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:01:49AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > --- a/include/linux/ipc_namespace.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/ipc_namespace.h
> > @@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ static inline int mq_init_ns(struct ipc_namespace *ns) { return 0; }
> >
> > #if defined(CONFIG_IPC_NS)
> > extern void free_ipc_ns(struct ipc_namespace *ns);
> > +struct ipc_namespace *create_ipc_ns(void);
> > extern struct ipc_namespace *copy_ipcs(unsigned long flags,
> > struct ipc_namespace *ns);
> > extern void free_ipcs(struct ipc_namespace *ns, struct ipc_ids *ids,
>
> Hm, doesnt the existing, correct pattern strike your eyes out:
>
> extern foo1();
> extern foo2();
> extern foo3();
>
> and then you add a new method in this inconsistent way:
>
> extern foo1();
> foox();
> extern foo2();
> extern foo3();
>
> Instead of continuing the existing pattern via:
>
> extern foo1();
> extern foox();
> extern foo2();
> extern foo3();
>
> ?
>
> I think we need a new checkpatch warning for such things. It might
> be a small detail in the big picture, but a thousand small details
> create a big mess easily so we have to try to get all the small
> details right, all the time - that is the only way to create a
> better kernel in the end.
We (OK, I don't care anyway) should remove extern in front of prototypes.
They slow down compilation, they make easier to overcome 80-column limit resulting in
multiline prototypes which are ugly.
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
More information about the Devel
mailing list