[Devel] Re: [PATCH 20/38] netns ct: NOTRACK in netns

[Patrick McHardy]

Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> Patrick McHardy wrote:
>>>> I think you could avoid this mess by using a struct nf_conntrack
>>>> for the untracked conntrack instead of struct nf_conn. It shouldn't
>>>> make any difference since its ignored anyways.
>>> Ewww, can I?
>> I hope so :) A different possiblity suggest by Pablo some time ago
>> would be to mark untracked packets in skb->nfctinfo and not
>> attach a conntrack at all.
> 
> Indeed, I remember that :). I left that patch of the table time ago [1].
> There's a nf_reset call missing as Patrick said at that time. I can
> recover it if you like the idea.

I think that would be a good idea.
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers