[Devel] Re: [BIG RFC] Filesystem-based checkpoint
Oren Laadan
orenl at cs.columbia.edu
Thu Oct 30 09:25:36 PDT 2008
Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 15:56 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>> If you like I can take a shot at whipping up the new mini-fs, though
>> I think you're having fun :)
>
> There are a couple of concepts that just get easier once you start
> thinking of this as an entire fs too. For instance, cr_ctx just becomes
> crfs_sb. For things like dumping in parallel, we get locking and
> lifetime rules for free from the vfs.
Well, 'cr_ctx' is per-checkpoint, while crfs_sb will single for the
entire system. So you'll need to add something per checkpoint anyway.
What other concepts get easier ?
Oren.
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
More information about the Devel
mailing list