[Devel] Re: [PATCH] netns: Delete virtual interfaces during namespace cleanup

[Eric W. Biederman]

Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano at fr.ibm.com> writes:

> Perhaps, I am misunderstanding your sentence :) But just in case, let me clarify
> my idea.
>
> If you have a TCP connection with a send queue not empty (the kernel has
> buffered the data the application has sent), when your process exits because the
> last socket write was done in userspace, the TCP socket will be orphan but still
> there taking a ref count on your network namespace. Hence the process and the
> network namespace life cycles is not correlated. This is a correct behavior, it
> is not a bug.

Agreed, letting the network stack finish sending the last bits of data from
sockets is not a bug.

The problem I see is having a veth device that exists in a child container,
and the application waiting for the child device to return to the current network
namespace.  Since we always return network devices to the initial network namespace
waiting for a device in a child container does not work in a recursive container.
And thus is a bug.

> Can a process outside of the network namespace look at this directory even if
> there are no more processes running inside the namespace ?

If you mount it somewhere besides /proc/self/net yes.

Say: mount --bind /proc/self/net /tmp/net

>> That is simple and will work quite nicely in the long term, and gives
>> us a lot more visibility than a simple this namespace has exited bit.
>
> This is nice :)
>
> Shouldn't you send /proc/net filesystem patch before sending the virtual network
> devices autodestroy patch ?

Well there is the cheap trick with this patch of waiting until the local end
of veth dies.

Eric

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers