[Devel] [RFC 4/4] memcg: NUMA background reclaim

[KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki]

One aspect of difference in reclaim logic between global lru and memcg is 
 * global LRU triggers memory reclaim at memory shortage.
 * memcg LRU triggers memory reclaim at excess of usage.

Then, global LRU _know_ which node we should start reclaim from.
 * start from a node at memory shortage or
 * start from a node where memory allocation is waiting

WRT memcg, it's difficult to find where we should start because
there is no memory shortage and LRU is splitted.
(But per-zone-LRU is definitely necessary for scalability.)

This patch tries to deteremine a node for starting recalim by checking
ratio of inactive pages/active pages in a node. And trying to avoid starting
from a node with relatively small usage.
Better algorithm is welcome.

Singed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiruyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu at jp.fujitsu.com>

Index: mm-2.6.26-rc2-mm1/mm/memcontrol.c
===================================================================
--- mm-2.6.26-rc2-mm1.orig/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ mm-2.6.26-rc2-mm1/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -578,7 +578,7 @@ retry:
 	if (state == RES_OVER_LIMIT) {
 		if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_WAIT))
 			goto out;
-		if (try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(mem, gfp_mask))
+		if (try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(mem, -1, gfp_mask))
 			goto retry;
 		/*
 		 * try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages() might not give us a
@@ -801,7 +801,7 @@ int mem_cgroup_shrink_usage(struct mm_st
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	do {
-		progress = try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(mem, gfp_mask);
+		progress = try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(mem, -1, gfp_mask);
 	} while (!progress && --retry);
 
 	if (!retry)
@@ -814,7 +814,7 @@ static void mem_cgroup_drop_all_pages(st
 {
 	int progress;
 	while (!res_counter_empty(&mem->res)) {
-		progress = try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(mem,
+		progress = try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(mem, -1,
 					GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE);
 		if (!progress) /* we did as much as possible */
 			break;
@@ -912,6 +912,62 @@ out:
 /*
  * background reclaim daemon.
  */
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
+/*
+ * Because memory controller's memory reclaim doesn't come from memory shortage,
+ * we cannot know which node should be reclaimed in an easy way.
+ * This routine select a node with inactive pages to be a node for starting
+ * scanning.
+ */
+int __select_best_node(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
+{
+	int nid;
+	int best_node = -1;
+	unsigned long highest_inactive_ratio = 0;
+	unsigned long active, inactive, inactive_ratio, total, threshold, flags;
+	struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz;
+	int zid;
+
+	/*
+	 * When a node's memory usage is smaller than 
+  	 * total_usage/num_of_node * 75%, we don't select the node
+	 */
+	total = mem->res.usage >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+	threshold = (total / num_node_state(N_HIGH_MEMORY)) * 3 / 4;
+
+	/*
+	 * See nodemask.h, N_HIGH_MEMORY means that a node has memory
+	 * can be used for user's memory.(i.e. not means HIGHMEM).
+	 */
+	for_each_node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY) {
+		active = 0;
+		inactive = 0;
+
+		for (zid = 0; zid < MAX_NR_ZONES; zid++) {
+			mz = mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(mem, nid, zid);
+			spin_lock_irqsave(&mz->lru_lock, flags);
+			active += MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT(mz, MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT_ACTIVE);
+			inactive +=
+				MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT(mz, MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT_INACTIVE);
+			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mz->lru_lock, flags);
+		}
+
+		if (active + inactive < threshold)
+			continue;
+		inactive_ratio = (inactive * 100) / (active + 1);
+		if (inactive_ratio > highest_inactive_ratio)
+			best_node = nid;
+	}
+	return best_node;
+}
+#else
+int __select_best_node(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+#endif
+
 static int mem_cgroup_reclaim_daemon(void *data)
 {
 	DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
@@ -935,13 +991,9 @@ static int mem_cgroup_reclaim_daemon(voi
 			continue;
 		}
 		finish_wait(&mem->daemon.waitq, &wait);
-		/*
-		 * memory resource controller doesn't see NUMA memory usage
-		 * balancing, becasue we cannot know what balancing is good.
-		 * TODO: some annotation or heuristics to detect which node
-		 * we should start reclaim from.
-		 */
-		ret = try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(mem, GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE);
+
+		ret = try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(mem,
+				__select_best_node(mem), GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE);
 
 		yield();
 	}
Index: mm-2.6.26-rc2-mm1/mm/vmscan.c
===================================================================
--- mm-2.6.26-rc2-mm1.orig/mm/vmscan.c
+++ mm-2.6.26-rc2-mm1/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1429,7 +1429,7 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_pages(struct z
 #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR
 
 unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(struct mem_cgroup *mem_cont,
-						gfp_t gfp_mask)
+					   int nid, gfp_t gfp_mask)
 {
 	struct scan_control sc = {
 		.may_writepage = !laptop_mode,
@@ -1442,9 +1442,11 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pag
 	};
 	struct zonelist *zonelist;
 
+	if (nid == -1)
+		nid = numa_node_id();
 	sc.gfp_mask = (gfp_mask & GFP_RECLAIM_MASK) |
 			(GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE & ~GFP_RECLAIM_MASK);
-	zonelist = NODE_DATA(numa_node_id())->node_zonelists;
+	zonelist = NODE_DATA(nid)->node_zonelists;
 	return do_try_to_free_pages(zonelist, &sc);
 }
 #endif
Index: mm-2.6.26-rc2-mm1/include/linux/swap.h
===================================================================
--- mm-2.6.26-rc2-mm1.orig/include/linux/swap.h
+++ mm-2.6.26-rc2-mm1/include/linux/swap.h
@@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ extern void swap_setup(void);
 extern unsigned long try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist, int order,
 					gfp_t gfp_mask);
 extern unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
-							gfp_t gfp_mask);
+						int nid, gfp_t gfp_mask);
 extern int __isolate_lru_page(struct page *page, int mode);
 extern unsigned long shrink_all_memory(unsigned long nr_pages);
 extern int vm_swappiness;

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers