[Devel] Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/4] PID: use the target ID specified in procfs

[Pavel Emelyanov]

Nadia Derbey wrote:
> Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
>> Nadia.Derbey at bull.net wrote:
>>
>>> @@ -122,14 +122,26 @@ static void free_pidmap(struct upid *upi
>>> 	atomic_inc(&map->nr_free);
>>> }
>>>
>>> -static int alloc_pidmap(struct pid_namespace *pid_ns)
>>> +static int alloc_pidmap(struct pid_namespace *pid_ns, struct pid_list *pid_l,
>>> +			int level)
>>> {
>>> 	int i, offset, max_scan, pid, last = pid_ns->last_pid;
>>> 	struct pidmap *map;
>>>
>>> -	pid = last + 1;
>>> -	if (pid >= pid_max)
>>> -		pid = RESERVED_PIDS;
>>> +	if (!pid_l) {
>>> +		pid = last + 1;
>>> +		if (pid >= pid_max)
>>> +			pid = RESERVED_PIDS;
>>> +	} else {
>>> +		/*
>>> +		 * There's a target pid, so use it instead
>>> +		 */
>>> +		BUG_ON(level < 0);
>>> +		pid = PID_AT(pid_l, level);
>>> +		if (pid >= pid_max)
>>> +			return -EINVAL;
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> 	offset = pid & BITS_PER_PAGE_MASK;
>>> 	map = &pid_ns->pidmap[pid/BITS_PER_PAGE];
>>> 	max_scan = (pid_max + BITS_PER_PAGE - 1)/BITS_PER_PAGE - !offset;
>>> @@ -153,9 +165,16 @@ static int alloc_pidmap(struct pid_names
>>> 			do {
>>> 				if (!test_and_set_bit(offset, map->page)) {
>>> 					atomic_dec(&map->nr_free);
>>> -					pid_ns->last_pid = pid;
>>> +					if (!pid_l)
>>> +						pid_ns->last_pid = pid;
>>> +					else
>>> +						pid_ns->last_pid = max(last,
>>> +									pid);
>>> 					return pid;
>>> 				}
>>> +				if (pid_l)
>>> +					/* Target pid is already in use */
>>> +					return -EBUSY;
>>> 				offset = find_next_offset(map, offset);
>>> 				pid = mk_pid(pid_ns, map, offset);
>>> 			/*
>>> @@ -179,7 +198,7 @@ static int alloc_pidmap(struct pid_names
>>> 		}
>>> 		pid = mk_pid(pid_ns, map, offset);
>>> 	}
>>> -	return -1;
>>> +	return -ENOMEM;
>>> }
>>>
>>> int next_pidmap(struct pid_namespace *pid_ns, int last)
>>
>> As fas as this particular piece of code is concerned this all can 
>> be shrunk down to
>>
>> static int set_vpidmap(struct pid_namespace *ns, int pid)
>> {
>>         int offset;
>>         pidmap_t *map;
>>
>>         offset = pid & BITS_PER_PAGE_MASK;
>>         map = ns->pidmap + vpid / BITS_PER_PAGE;
>>
>>         if (unlikely(alloc_pidmap_page(map)))
>>                 return -ENOMEM;
>>
>>         if (test_and_set_bit(offset, map->page))
>>                 return -EEXIST;
>>
>>         atomic_dec(&map->nr_free);
>>         return pid;
>> }
>>
>> where the alloc_pidmap_page is a consolidated part of code from alloc_pidmap.
>>
>> And I'm scared of what the alloc_pid is going to become.
>>
>>
> 
> It's true that I made alloc_pid() become uggly, but this patchset was 
> more intended to continue a discussion.
> 
> What we could do is the following (not compiled, not tested...):
> 
> struct pid *alloc_pid(struct pid_namespace *ns)
> {
>          struct pid *pid;
>          enum pid_type type;
>          int i, nr;
>          struct pid_namespace *tmp;
>          struct upid *upid;
> 
>          pid = kmem_cache_alloc(ns->pid_cachep, GFP_KERNEL);
>          if (!pid) {
>                  pid = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>                  goto out;
>          }
> 
>          tmp = ns;
>          i = ns->level;
> 
>          if (current->next_id && (current->next_id->flag & SYS_ID_PID)) {
>                  tmp = set_predefined_pids(ns,
>                                current->next_id->pid_ids);
>                  if (IS_ERR(tmp)) {
>                          nr = PTR_ERR(tmp);
>                          goto out_free;
>                  }
>          }
> 
>          /*
>           * Let the lower levels upid nrs be automatically allocated
>           */
>          for ( ; i >= 0; i--) {
>                  nr = alloc_pidmap(tmp, NULL, -1);
>                  if (nr < 0)
>                          goto out_free;
> ....
> 
> which would only add a test and a function call to alloc_pid() ==> more 
> readable.
> with set_predefined_pids defined as follows (still not compiled, not 
> tested, ...):
> 
> struct pid_namespace *set_predefined_pids(struct pid_namespace *ns,
>                                          struct pid_list *pid_l)
> {
>          int rel_level;
> 
>          BUG_ON(!pid_l);
> 
>          rel_level = pid_l->npids - 1;
>          if (rel_level > ns->level)
>                  return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> 
>          /*
>           * Use the predefined upid nrs for levels ns->level down to
>           * ns->level - rel_level
>           */
>          for ( ; rel_level >= 0; i--, rel_level--) {
>                  nr = alloc_pidmap(tmp, pid_l, rel_level);
>                  if (nr < 0)
>                          return ERR_PTR(nr);
> 
>                  pid->numbers[i].nr = nr;
>                  pid->numbers[i].ns = tmp;
>                  tmp = tmp->parent;
>          }
> 
>          current->next_id->flag &= ~SYS_ID_PID;
>          pids_free(pid_l);
>          current->next_id->pid_ids = NULL;
> 
>          return tmp;
> }
> 
> 
> Don't you think that mixing this with your 1st proposal (the 
> set_vpidmap() one), would make things look better?

I'd prefer seeing

--- a/kernel/pid.c
+++ b/kernel/pid.c
@@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ struct pid *alloc_pid(struct pid_namespace *ns)
 {
        struct pid *pid;
        enum pid_type type;
-       int i, nr;
+       int i, nr, req_nr;
        struct pid_namespace *tmp;
        struct upid *upid;
 
@@ -257,7 +257,11 @@ struct pid *alloc_pid(struct pid_namespace *ns)
 
        tmp = ns;
        for (i = ns->level; i >= 0; i--) {
-               nr = alloc_pidmap(tmp);
+               req_nr = get_required_pidnr(ns, i);
+               if (req_nr > 0)
+                       nr = set_pidmap(tmp, req_nr);
+               else
+                       nr = alloc_pidmap(tmp);
                if (nr < 0)
                        goto out_free;
 

in alloc_pid() and not much than that.

> Regards,
> Nadia
> 

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers