[Devel] Re: network namespace ipv6 perfs
Daniel Lezcano
dlezcano at fr.ibm.com
Mon Mar 3 12:01:18 PST 2008
Rick Jones wrote:
> Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Some performance tests was made by Benjamin to watch out the impact of
>> the network namespace. The good news is there is no impact when used
>> with or without namespaces. That has been checked using a real network
>> device inside a network namespace.
>
> The *_RR tests seem to show a drop in througput and corresponding
> increases in service demand - could that be because things like TSO et
> al cannot mask much of anything in the way of a path-length increase?
Hmm. In fact Benjamin took the 2.6.23.16 kernel where there were no
network namespace code at all. So these differences between 2.6.23.16
and 2.6.25-rc1 does not show a performance degradation especially
related to the network namespaces. The important point is the 2.6.25-rc1
without ipv6 netns and 2.6.25-rc1 with ipv6 netns code applied, I mean
the second and the third line and we can point that the ipv6 netns code
does not degrade performances for either throughput and service demand.
> From the annotations, I'm ass-u-me-ing that NS was only used on the
> netperf side and not both netperf and netserver side?
right :)
> happy benchmarking,
Thanks Rick.
-- Daniel
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
More information about the Devel
mailing list