[Devel] Re: v2.6.26-rc7/cgroups: circular locking dependency
Cyrill Gorcunov
gorcunov at gmail.com
Sun Jun 22 02:10:13 PDT 2008
[Vegard Nossum - Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 07:38:59PM +0200]
| Hi,
|
| I decided to see what cgroups is all about, and followed the instructions
| in Documentation/cgroups.txt :-) It happened when I did this:
|
| [root at damson /dev/cgroup/Vegard 0]
| # echo 1 > cpuset.cpus
|
| I can also provide the kernel config if necessary.
|
|
| Vegard
|
|
| =======================================================
| [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
| 2.6.26-rc7 #25
| -------------------------------------------------------
| bash/10032 is trying to acquire lock:
| (&cpu_hotplug.lock){--..}, at: [<c015efbc>] get_online_cpus+0x2c/0x40
|
| but task is already holding lock:
| (cgroup_mutex){--..}, at: [<c0160e6f>] cgroup_lock+0xf/0x20
|
| which lock already depends on the new lock.
|
|
| the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
|
| -> #1 (cgroup_mutex){--..}:
| [<c015a435>] __lock_acquire+0xf45/0x1040
| [<c015a5c8>] lock_acquire+0x98/0xd0
| [<c05416d1>] mutex_lock_nested+0xb1/0x300
| [<c0160e6f>] cgroup_lock+0xf/0x20
| [<c0164750>] cpuset_handle_cpuhp+0x20/0x180
| [<c014ea77>] notifier_call_chain+0x37/0x70
| [<c014eae9>] __raw_notifier_call_chain+0x19/0x20
| [<c051f8c8>] _cpu_down+0x78/0x240
| [<c051fabb>] cpu_down+0x2b/0x40
| [<c0520cd9>] store_online+0x39/0x80
| [<c02f627b>] sysdev_store+0x2b/0x40
| [<c01d3372>] sysfs_write_file+0xa2/0x100
| [<c0195486>] vfs_write+0x96/0x130
| [<c0195b4d>] sys_write+0x3d/0x70
| [<c010831b>] sysenter_past_esp+0x78/0xd1
| [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
|
| -> #0 (&cpu_hotplug.lock){--..}:
| [<c0159fe5>] __lock_acquire+0xaf5/0x1040
| [<c015a5c8>] lock_acquire+0x98/0xd0
| [<c05416d1>] mutex_lock_nested+0xb1/0x300
| [<c015efbc>] get_online_cpus+0x2c/0x40
| [<c0163e6d>] rebuild_sched_domains+0x7d/0x3a0
| [<c01653a4>] cpuset_common_file_write+0x204/0x440
| [<c0162bc7>] cgroup_file_write+0x67/0x130
| [<c0195486>] vfs_write+0x96/0x130
| [<c0195b4d>] sys_write+0x3d/0x70
| [<c010831b>] sysenter_past_esp+0x78/0xd1
| [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
|
| other info that might help us debug this:
|
| 1 lock held by bash/10032:
| #0: (cgroup_mutex){--..}, at: [<c0160e6f>] cgroup_lock+0xf/0x20
|
| stack backtrace:
| Pid: 10032, comm: bash Not tainted 2.6.26-rc7 #25
| [<c0157ae7>] print_circular_bug_tail+0x77/0x90
| [<c0159fe5>] __lock_acquire+0xaf5/0x1040
| [<c015a5c8>] lock_acquire+0x98/0xd0
| [<c015efbc>] ? get_online_cpus+0x2c/0x40
| [<c05416d1>] mutex_lock_nested+0xb1/0x300
| [<c015efbc>] ? get_online_cpus+0x2c/0x40
| [<c015efbc>] ? get_online_cpus+0x2c/0x40
| [<c015efbc>] get_online_cpus+0x2c/0x40
| [<c0163e6d>] rebuild_sched_domains+0x7d/0x3a0
| [<c0158e65>] ? mark_held_locks+0x65/0x80
| [<c0190ac5>] ? kfree+0xb5/0x120
| [<c027736a>] ? heap_free+0xa/0x10
| [<c027736a>] ? heap_free+0xa/0x10
| [<c01653a4>] cpuset_common_file_write+0x204/0x440
| [<c0163c30>] ? started_after+0x0/0x70
| [<c010e585>] ? native_sched_clock+0xb5/0x110
| [<c0162e10>] ? started_after+0x0/0x70
| [<c0164c80>] ? cpuset_test_cpumask+0x0/0x20
| [<c0164ca0>] ? cpuset_change_cpumask+0x0/0x20
| [<c0162bc7>] cgroup_file_write+0x67/0x130
| [<c01651a0>] ? cpuset_common_file_write+0x0/0x440
| [<c010e585>] ? native_sched_clock+0xb5/0x110
| [<c0195486>] vfs_write+0x96/0x130
| [<c0162b60>] ? cgroup_file_write+0x0/0x130
| [<c0195b4d>] sys_write+0x3d/0x70
| [<c010831b>] sysenter_past_esp+0x78/0xd1
| =======================
|
Hi Vegard,
would be interesting to see your config please
- Cyrill -
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
More information about the Devel
mailing list