[Devel] Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] CR: save/restore a single, simple task

[Dave Hansen]

On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 16:35 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> So task 5 created its mm_struct, task 6 is
> supposed to use the same mm_struct, so it finds that out from the
> context?  I wonder whether that would start to become complicated
> when checkpointing nested containers.

It also doesn't fit well with the nsproxy idea.  It would be very hard
to tell which nsproxies should be shared until the entire restart has
been completed and we've been able to figure out which ones are the
same.

This is just a coding/implementation issue, but I think it does reveal a
difference in ideology between these patches and the way that the kernel
works up until now. :)

-- Dave

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers