[Devel] Re: memrlimit controller merge to mainline

Daisuke Nishimura nishimura at mxp.nes.nec.co.jp
Tue Jul 29 21:58:03 PDT 2008


On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:14:07 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu at jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:11:15 +0900
> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu at jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:52:26 +0900
> > KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu at jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > > mem+swap controller means a shrink to memory resource controller 
> > > (try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages()) should drop only file caches.
> > > (Because kick-out-to-swap will never changes the usage.)
> > > 
> > > right ? only global-lru can make a swap.
> > > maybe I can add optimization to do this. Hmm. I should see how OOM works
> > > under some situation.
> > > 
I'm thinking mem+swap controller in a different way: an add-on to
mem controller, just as current swap controller.
I mean adding "memory.(mem+swap)_limit".

> > (I'm sorry that I'm not a good writer of e-mail.)
> > 
> > A brief summary about changes to mem controller.
> > 
> >  - mem+swap controller which limits the # sum of pages and swap_entries.
> >  - mem+swap controller just drops file caches when it reaches limit.
> >  - under mem+swap controller, recaliming Anon pages make no sense.
> >    Then,
> >       - LRU for Anon is not necessary.
> >       - LRU for tmpfs/shmem is not necessary.
> >       just showing account is better.
> >  - we should see try_to_free_mem_cgroup() again to avoid too much OOM.
> >    Maybe Retries=5 is too small because we never do swap under us.
> >    a problem like struck-into-ext3-journal can easily make file-cache reclaim
> >    difficult.
> >  - need some changes to documentation.
> >  - Should we have on/off switch of taking swap into account ?
> >    or should we implement mem+swap contoller in different name than
> >    "memory" controller ?
> >    If swap is not accounted, we need to do swap-out in memory reclaiming path,
> >    again.
> >    
> Then, mem+swap controller finally means
>  - under mem+swap controller, program works with no swap. Only global LRU
>    may make pages swapped-out.
>  - If swap-accounting-mode is off, swap can be used unlimitedly.
> 
> Hmm, sounds a bit differenct from what I want. How about others ?
> 

Thanks,
Daisuke Nishimura.
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers




More information about the Devel mailing list