[Devel] Re: [PATCH 1/2] signals: kill(-1) should only signal processes in the same namespace

[Eric W. Biederman]

sukadev at us.ibm.com writes:
>

> Like Pavel said, we had couple of attempts to fix the larger problem of
> signal semantics in containers but did not have a consensus on handling
> blocked/unhandled signals to container-init.

Oh.  I thought we were pretty close then I or somebody ran out of steam.

> It would still be good to fix this "kill -1" problem.
>
> Eric had a slightly optimized interface, 'pid_in_pid_ns()' in following
> patchset. Maybe we could use that ?
>
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/containers/2007-December/009174.html

Eric

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers at lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers